India must respect Kangleipak's history: PREMK-Pro-ll
Source: Chronicle News Service
Imphal, October 10 2021:
There are allegations that the intelligence agencies did not try to stop the Parliament attack in 2001, Godhra train burning in 2002, terrorist attacks of Pulwama and Uri even though they had received convincing informa tion in advance.
In the name of maintaining tranquillity, the wheelchaired hawkish bureaucrats chalked out the 'offensive defence doctrine' by which the hot pursuit and arbitrary arrests are the pre-emptive parameters.
The development and growth of China has been a world's ideal.
The Chinese government had implemented the people's livelihood policy by following the metaphorical proverb of 'teaching a man to fish is better than giving him a fish'.
However, India is playing policy of doles by distributing freebies, free rice and handful of moAey for electoral gains.
Government of India has been implementing more than 20 poverty alleviation programmes starting from 'Garibi Hatao' but there is no meaningful decrease in poverty.
The fact of the matter is that these socialist programmes were managed by those luxurious ministers and bureaucrats who are being categorized as Champagne Socialists.
They can be called as Delhi Lutyens' socialists or Imphal Babupara's socialists.
The adage of Jose Ortega Y Gasset that a revolution only lasts 15 years, a period which coincides with the effectiveness of a generation, needs to be deeply analysed.
The faster pervading social changes have pounded adversely to the revolutionary parties.
Kanglei people need a timely preparation to face these negative impacts.
It is now imperative that revolution and liberation struggle must be together.
PREPAK-Pro believes that the revolutionary struggle is just to establish a self-sufficing and self-determined Kangleipak by barricading the Kanglei society against the Indian colonialism.
This is a necessary but not a sufficient means.
The prolong living under India's suppression (colonialism) would not finish off the whacking problems of Kangleipak as ultimate solution wouid be achieved through armed liberation struggle.
However, the liberation struggle must be integrated together with people, which could not be achieved during the last 45 plus years of armed struggle.
This has been weakness of Kanglei revolutionaries.
Being a revolutionary party, PREPAK-Pro should be courageous to correct weakness and irrational policies in time, he added.
On the appeal made by chief minister Biren to resolve insurgency problem peacefully and his willingness to be a bridge for solution, L Paliba M said that Biren's proposal was appreciable but not welcoming at this moment.
Would it be a breakable bamboo bridge where crossers faced frequent lose footing? It is obvious that Kashmiris.
Sikhs, Dravidians of Southern five states have strong desire to change the political structure of India as Confederation of India.
The.
poor peasants, workers, and indigenous people of Maoists prone 10 states wanted the socialist programme of equal distribution, and they don't want their natural resources to be managed by wealthy people and big companies.
But the Government of India doesn't take seriously these hitherto known demands, let alone the solution of insurgency.
There would be no holistic solution to political conflicts if there is a rigid mindset to keep everything inside the wall of the Constitution of India, it was an ideal insight when Atal Behari Vajpayee once said Kashmiri problem should be solved through humanity (In-saniyat).
It is not certain the present government might own that ideal.
The humanity and historical uniqueness of Kangleipak are the parameters to seek the main causes of insurgency.
Kanglei people wish India must be a union of independent States like the European Union, with whom independent Kangleipak would establish a paramount relation.
The geopolitics and geo-economic condition of the Kangleipak would impel the necessary good relation between the neighbour and closer countries such as India, Myanmar, Bangladesh and China, L Paliba M added, while sharing his views through a statement.
(Concluded) .
Comment
