AFSPA must be replaced with amended CrPC, advocates Meghalaya Governor
Act for security force and civilians mooted
Source: The Sangai Express / Agencies

Shillong, January 27 2013 : Meghalaya Governor RS Mooshahary Sunday advocated that the controversial Armed Forces Special Powers Act (AFSPA) must be replaced with an amended Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) so that both security forces and civilians rights are protected.

"AFSPA represents the face of the security force, but the CrPC does not.

So, it needs to be replaced with some Act that is both for the civilians and the armed forces," Mooshahary told IANS.

"The AFSPA should be repealed and instead the CrPC must be amended suitably with relevant provisions for protection of the rights of the security forces together with those of the civilians," he suggested.

Mooshahary, who favoured the repeal of AFSPA in the region, said that prolonged use of the AFSPA has alienated the civil society.

"We cannot contain insurgency related violence by alienating the citizens; we can do so more effectively by involving them.

If the CrPC is amended, it would not be an isolated Act only for the civilians, but also be dealing with the rights of the security forces," the former chief of the elite National Security Guard said.

"In the amended Act the rights of the security forces as well as the civilians can be adequately taken care of" .

The AFSPA was passed to grant special powers and immunity from prosecution to security forces to deal with raging insurgencies in North Eastern States in large parts of Manipur, Tripura, Assam and Nagaland and some parts of Meghalaya and in Jammu and Kashmir.

File of the historic nude protest in front of Kangla on July 15 2004 to demand the repeal of AFSPA

The Act is targeted by local human rights groups and international campaigners such as Amnesty International, which say the law has been an excuse for extrajudicial killings.

Amnesty has campaigned vociferously against the legislation, which it sees as a stain on India's democratic credentials and a violation of international human rights laws.

However, army officials dealing in counter-insurgency have maintained that it is for the Central and the State Governments to decide whether to repeal or continue the Act.

"Human right groups never speak against the violence committed against security forces.

For the men in uniform, the AFSPA is one of the Acts that gives their human rights protection," said an army official, who is involved in counter-insurgency operations in Manipur.

Irom Sharmila Chanu, a human rights activist, has been on indefinite hunger strike for nearly a decade in Manipur, demanding the withdrawal of the AFSPA from the state.

Several human rights groups, including the powerful North East Students' Organisation (NESO), has also been demanding withdrawal of the AFSPA from the northeast.

"Instead of solving the militancy problem in the northeast, the act is complicating the situation.

It has resulted in a war between the people and the members of the armed forces," said NESO chairman Samuel Jyrwa.

In view of the outcry against the AFSPA, the central government had appointed a five-member committee headed by Supreme Court Justice BP Jeevan Reddy a few years ago to examine whether the legislated law was required or not.

After visiting all affected states, the committee submitted its report to the central government in October 2006.The union government has not yet made the findings public.

Not only the Jeevan Reddy's Committee, the Administrative Reforms Commission headed by Veerappa Moily too has recommended that the controversial act must be reviewed.