Joy prods Governor to scrap 'doctrine of pleasure' jobs
Source: Chronicle News Service

Imphal, March 03 2025: Former law minister Okram Joy submitted a representation to Governor Ajay Kumar Bhalla on Monday, reminding him of his earlier appeal dated February 17, 2025, regarding the necessity of ceasing the functioning of posts appointed under the doctrine of pleasure to prevent a constitutional crisis.

In his representation, Joy highlighted that Manipur has been placed under President's Rule after almost two years since the state faced unrest situation, and the state assembly kept under suspended animation.

He acknowledged the Governor's recent initiatives in addressing the situation and noted the role of the advocate general and the chief secretary in ensuring appropriate governance for the public.

Joy reiterated his earlier position that the advocate general, being appointed under the doctrine of pleasure - meaning at the discretion of the government - can no longer continue once the popular government is dissolved or rendered non-functional.

Further pointing out that the advocate general is responsible for discharging constitutional functions and performing statutory duties under civil, criminal, and other legal frameworks, the seasoned politician cautioned that if the principle of appointment under the doctrine of pleasure is not adhered to in the crisis-hit state, it could lead to a constitutional breakdown, irregularities, or complications in discharging constitutional functions.

The minister further stated that Under the settled principle of the doctrine of pleasure, the incumbents holding such posts could be terminated without any notice if they do not tender resignation.

He insisted that the principle of co-terminus must be followed to avoid a further constitutional crisis while resolving the ongoing one.

Expressing concern over the lack of response to his previous appeal, O Joy reminded the Governor on urgency of the matter.

He urged immediate attention to prevent another constitutional crisis in the state, declaring that his appeal was made in the larger public interest.

Comment