Delhi gang-rape case : Juvenile found guilty of rape, murder
Source: The Sangai Express / Agencies

New Delhi, August 31 2013 : Nearly nine months after a 23-year-old medical student was gang-raped by six persons on a moving bus in Delhi, the Juvenile Justice Board today pronounced the juvenile guilty.

The teenager has been found guilty of taking part in the gang rape of a paramedical student, his lawyer said.

He will be sent to a correctional home for three years.

Under Juvenile Justice Act, a person can face a maximum sentence of three years confinement at a reformatory home.

The case against the juvenile offender had sparked a lot of public outrage with demands being raised to bring down the age to be declared juvenile from 18 to 16 years.

The debate started after it was found that the juvenile accused was just a few months short of turning major (18) at the time of the incident.

In fact, during the pendency of the trial, the juvenile accused attained majority.

Yet, he was tried as a juvenile as the law treats a person as a juvenile if at the time of the commission of offence he/she was below 18 years of age.

Policemen escort the juvenile (in pink hood), accused in the Dec 2012 gang-rape of a student, to a court in New Delhi on Saturday

The doubts that were raised that he was an adult at the time of the incident were put to rest after the board declared him a juvenile on the basis of his school certificates.

Though the trial ended in the first week of July, it had to be deferred by the board four times on the ground that the Supreme Court is to decide on maintainability of a PIL seeking fresh interpretation of the term 'juvenile' in the statute.

The victim's mother denounced the sentence, which was the maximum the defendant faced.

The family had long insisted the teenager be tried as an adult � and so face the death penalty � insisting he was the most brutal of the woman's attackers.

"He should be hanged irrespective of whether he is a juvenile or not.

He should be punished for what he did to my daughter," the mother, Asha Devi, told reporters after the verdict was announced.

Indian law forbids the publication of the teenager's name because he was sentenced in a juvenile court.

The attack, which left the 23-year-old victim with such extensive internal injuries that she died two weeks later, sparked protests across the country and led to reforms of India's antiquated sexual violence laws.

The government, facing immense public pressure, had promised swift justice in the case.

The convicted defendant was one of six people accused of tricking the woman and her male companion into boarding an off-duty bus Dec.

16 after they had seen an afternoon showing of "Life of Pi" at a upscale shopping mall.

Police say the men raped the woman and used a metal bar to inflict massive internal injuries to her.

They also beat her companion.

The victims were dumped naked on the roadside, and the woman died from her injuries in a Singapore hospital.

The victim's father said the family was deeply disappointed with the verdict.

"This is completely unacceptable to us," Badrinath Singh said.

"We are not satisfied with this outcome.

He is virtually being set free.

This is very wrong" .

Indian law forbids the publication of the names of rape victims, even if they die.

SK Singh, a lawyer for the victim's family, said they would challenge the juvenile court's verdict in a higher court.

"We will also seek a review of the man's age by a medical panel, since we believe he was not a juvenile when the incident took place," Singh said.

In India, especially in rural areas, many people do not have their births properly registered, and school certificates are used as proof of age.

Singh and the defendant's lawyer, Rajesh Tewari, both confirmed that the defendant had been convicted and his sentence.

Four of the other defendants are being tried in a special fast-track court in New Delhi and face the death penalty.

The sixth accused was found dead in his jail cell in March.

The court is expected to hand down the rest of the verdicts in September.

The convicted defendant was tried as a minor on charges including murder and rape.

The time he spent in a juvenile home since he was arrested in December will count as part of his sentence, Tewari said.

The attack set off furious protests across India about the treatment of women in the country and led to an overhaul of sexual assault laws.

A government panel set to suggest reforms to sexual assault laws rejected calls to lower the age at which people can be tried as adults from 18 to 16 .

In July, India's top court also refused to reduce the age of a juvenile from 18 to 16 years.

However, it later agreed to hear a new petition seeking to take the "mental and intellectual maturity" of the defendant into account and not just age.