How to lead ? Understanding the political turmoil and unresolved violence in Manipur

Heisnam Devan Singh *

The phrase ‘How to lead?’ resonates deeply within the framework of political leadership, particularly in regions plagued by conflicts and strife. This metaphor embodies the troubling idea the inept leadership can guide more capable individuals towards chaos rather than other.

In the context of Manipur, a North Eastern State of India that has faced over 16 months of significant political turmoil and unresolved violence, this phrase serves as potent lens through which to examine the ongoing crisis. Historically rich and diverse, Manipur is home to various ethnic communities including the Meiteis, Nagas, Kukis and Meitei Pangals, all of which have unique identities, cultural practices, and aspirations for political representation and autonomy.

The roots of the current unrest can be traced to a complex interplay of historical grievances, ethnic -tensions, and contemporary socio-political dynamics. Over the past year, violence erupted following a number of developments including Manipur Govt’s mass destruction of poppy plantations, eviction from Reserved Forest areas and War on Drugs which were perceived by some communities as a direct threat to their interests.

This precarious situation has led to violent clashes, loss of life, displacement of thousands and deepening divisions among communities that are already struggling to coexist peacefully. The mismanagement of this tension showcases the central question of leadership efficacy, underscoring how a lack of competent governance can transform a volatile situation into a full-blown humanitarian crisis.

In this scenario, the question that “How to lead” becomes strikingly relevant as political leaders appear ill-equipped to handle the complexities of ethnic identities and grievances that underpin the violence.

The ineffectiveness of leadership has manifested in numerous ways, from inflammatory rhetoric that polarizes communities to the inadequate response to escalating violence, which has only stoked further animosity. Rather than working toward inclusivity and dialogue, some leaders seem more focused on consolidating power or appeasing certain factions.

Undermining the potential for unity in a deeply fragmented social landscape. The heavy presence of security forces deployed to restore order only added another layer of complexity, often resulting in human rights violations and further alienation of communities for whom the State is supposed to provide protection.

The scenario becomes reminiscent of an inept leader trying to lead his soldiers into battle, where the soldiers, more powerful and capable, find themselves navigating a chaotic landscape without proper guidance, ultimately leading to greater confusion and disorder.

The violence that has erupted is not merely a consequence of local grievances but is exacerbated by the political machinations of National parties that seek to exploit ethnic divisions for electoral gains. In this way, the local leadership’s failure to address the nuanced needs and aspirations of various communities plays into larger political narratives, leaving many to question whether their leaders are indeed fit to guide them toward peace.

Amidst this turmoil, the impact on everyday lives is profound, as business suffer and families are displaced. The socio-economic repercussions of ongoing violence extend beyond immediate physical safety to affect the long-term development and stability of the region.

The cycle of violence has created an environment where despair and hopelessness can flourish, driving individuals toward extreme measures as a response to their gruelling circumstances. As communities look to their leaders for guidance, the consistent failure to provide effective governance and meaningful engagement leaves many questioning not only who is leading them but also the very foundation of their leadership.

The question ‘How to lead?’ thus transforms from a metaphorical inquiry into a pressing concern about the competency and character of those who hold power. Resolving Manipur’s challenges demand a critical reassessment of leadership styles and approaches, emphasizing inclusivity, accountability, and a commitment to peace.

Competent leadership must prioritize open dialogue and genuine engagement with all communities, seeking not just to silence dissent but to actively promote understanding and cooperation.

Moreover empowering local communities to take part in decision-making processes serves as a strategic approach to bridge divide and foster collaboration. Furthermore effective governance must also address the socio-economic disparities that fuel conflict.

By investing in education, infrastructure, and healthcare, leadership can tackle the underlying issues that drive communities apart . When citizens witness tangible improvement in their lives, they may be less inclined to engage in violence as means of expressing dissatisfaction.

The notion of an ‘Inept leadership leading soldiers’ highlights the serious consequences of ineffective leadership— the inability to steer communities toward peace, development and prosperity. In order to diverge from this troubling path, leaders in Manipur must embody the qualities necessary for genuine governance; integrity, vision and a commitment to serving all constituents fairly.

As the people of Manipur navigate these complex challenges, it is crucial for them to hold their leaders accountable and demand a shift toward a more inclusive and effective political environment.

Instead of allowing inept leadership to guide them toward chaos, the citizens of Manipur can advocate for leaders who are willing to listen, learn, and work collaboratively to create a future where all ethnicities can thrive without fear or violence.

Understanding that leadership is not just about authority but also about responsibility serves as a guiding principle on this journey towards resolution. The people of Manipur deserve leaders who are prepared to tackle complexities with empathy and foresight, ensuring that no community is left behind in the pursuit of a harmonious existence.

In addressing the question posed by the question ‘How to lead ?’, one must recognize that it is not just a reflection of the leaders’ capabilities but also a call for the people to demand accountability, inclusivity, and above all, the vision necessary to steer communities away from chaos and walk toward the light of peace and cooperation.