Para 9 of draft ILP - Non-Local Bill
August 21 2016
Para 9 " No suit, prosecution or other legal proceedings shall lie against any officer of the State Government for anything which is good faith done or intended to be done under this act".
This ambiguous statement may create more troubles in near future in implementation of the bill. This clause doesnt give any remedy for grievance redressal. We, human beings are bound to make mistakes. Even District Judges, High Court Judges gives erroneous judgements which goes against the principle of natural justice. this is the reason why we have the process of Appeals.
We can appeal to higher authority to get justice. but the para 9 of the said bill prevented us from going anywhere when we are harassed by State Officials. Nepotism, Communalism, Corruption are deeply engraved inside the Machinery of State Government and State Politics. In such environment, citizens are harrased on day to day basis by those people who are in power.
Even we are being harrassed by VDF, Police personnel who are answerable to the rule of law. Also, conditions of Manipur is not conducive to development.
Bandh, Blockades, Disturbances, Threats, Gun culture etc. are our tradition. In this condition, how can we expect a State Government Official to discharge his duties wholeheartedly and without any bias.
In his course of action, he commits mistakes and will surely commit mistakes in order to fulfill the immediate requirements. When Officials commit mistakes, ultimate sufferer is the normal people. Officials may act against local/non local people. A tribe from Nagaland/Mizoram may suffer in the hands of Meetei Officials.
A Bihari visitor may be manhandled by State Officials. A muslim from other states/countries who comes on religious tour may be harrassed by a Meetei Official. A local Manipuri may be harrassed by State Officials for non compliance of rules. We can imagine in a number of ways because duties , power and functions of State Officials are not clearly spelt out.
Where will we go and submit our grievences when the Bill has already given immunity to State Official in good faith ? In AFSPA 1958, Officers/Jawans can shoot anybody who he thinks terrorist, because he is being given immunity from prosecution. it seems that, due to long rule of AFSPA, our mind has started working on the lines of AFSPA !!
So, instead of giving immunity to erring officials, it will be better to delete the said para. Instead, a mechanism for grievance redressal may be added.
9 " Any aggrieved person, Local/Non local, who feels victimsed or suffered in the hands of Directorate Officials may submit their grievance in writing to the Director within 15 days from the date of occurrence of incidents/accidents"
yours
Mohd Amir
Yairipok Bamonleikai
Thoubal Manipur
* This Press Relese was sent to Mohd Amir who can be contacted at anjamir2003(AT)gmail(DOT)com
This Press Release was posted on August 22 2016
* Comments posted by users in this discussion thread and other parts of this site are opinions of the individuals posting them (whose user ID is displayed alongside) and not the views of e-pao.net. We strongly recommend that users exercise responsibility, sensitivity and caution over language while writing your opinions which will be seen and read by other users. Please read a complete Guideline on using comments on this website.