No delimitation, no Assembly elections |
By: H Benjamin Mate * |
With an object to fulfil the salient points of the said Constitutional Amendment, the interest of all the people in Manipur is not to stall the process of delimitation taken up by the Delimitation Commission which is the absolute and apex authority as provided in Section 10(2) of the Delimitation Act, 2002. It is also pertinent to mention that the Registrar General and Census Commissioner also is the supreme authority in regard to the process of census in the country. As such, Constitution of Officers Committee by the State to review the census is a futile exercise. Precisely, after the publication of the final population figures of the State in June 2004 by the Census Authority it may be safely presumed that the Government of the State, the Secular Progressive (SPF) Govt led by the Congress was in the know of it. Sleeping over a matter which is a direct concern of the State Govt for a long time cannot be an excuse for blurred and untimely pleadings. Even assuming that there was faulty, defective and manipulated census figure, who else is there in the dock except the SPF Govt? On the basis of 2001 census and when the re-work on reservation for the tribal people was done, three Assembly constituencies should be reduced from the existing forty Assembly constituencies in the valley and three Assembly seats are to be added to the existing 19 reserved seats according to the Delimitation Commission's concept paper. It is the outcome of simple Arithmetic sans manipulation or favouritism. It is unfortunate and lamentable some eminent citizens of the State including O Ibobi Singh, Chief Minister displayed pungent words of threat of turmoil and bloodshed in their representation to the court and the Delimitation Commission in order to stall the proceedings of delimitation after the preliminary meeting of the Delimitation Commission on the 24th June 2003 in which the Associate members also were present and where they have decided to increase three Assembly seats reserved for the tribal people in Ukhrul, Senapati and Chandel districts. The award of the Delimitation Commission on the final 2001 census to the tribal people is not tantamount to extortion from the majority community. Denying the Constitutional right of the tribal people will be a glaring instance, a sabotage which runs counter to the veritable policy of co-existence in our State. Let us not forget that 50 Kangpoki Assembly Constituency which is in the heart of Sadar Hills Autonomous district is a general constituency till today. The affidavit submitted by the Registrar General and Census Commissioner to the Delimitation Commission in June 2004 as regard to final population figure of the State, the affidavit of the Delimitation Commission and the Election Commission are final and are absolute decisions. The decision taken by the Delimitation Commission and RR Rashmi, Chief Electoral Officer of Manipur on the 23rd Nov 2006 in Delhi asserted that the Gauhati High Court should be approached to revoke the earlier interim order to stall the process of the delimitation. Let them keep their words. After the Munich peace conference in 1939 before the Second World War, the British Prime Minister, Neville Chamberlain said, 'Our patience is at an end'. Likewise the patience of the tribal people in Manipur is at an end when we think about the dissolution of the six Autonomous district Councils about eighteen years back in 1989 by the Congress Ministry. What is the special reason for not reviving the District Councils by the SPF Govt? At the time of demanding full-fledged statehood, autonomy in the hill districts was projected as the cementing force of territorial integrity of Manipur to the Central leaders. The sinister move to steal delimitation of Assembly constituencies or even it is revived, attempt not to apply in the coming Assembly elections would result in blitzkrieg agitation from the tribal people. H Benjamin Mate wrote this article for The Sangai Express. This article was webcasted on January 09th, 2007. |
* Comments posted by users in this discussion thread and other parts of this site are opinions of the individuals posting them (whose user ID is displayed alongside) and not the views of e-pao.net. We strongly recommend that users exercise responsibility, sensitivity and caution over language while writing your opinions which will be seen and read by other users. Please read a complete Guideline on using comments on this website.