Draft Asian Declaration on right to justice
- right to an effective remedy for violations of human rights -
- Part 4 -
Asian Human Rights Commission *
A Paper by the Asian Human Rights Commission
WORLD: Draft Asian Declaration on right to justice - right to an effective remedy for violations of human rights in terms of Article 2 of the ICCPR
A supplement to the Asian Human Rights Charter launched in Gwangju, South Korea on 17 May, 1998
This declaration is to be launched on the 20th anniversary of launching of the Asian Human Rights Charter (A People's Charter)
Elimination of confessions made in custody being admitted as evidence
of guilt:
The principle of fair trial is not part of the way the law is
practiced in many Asian countries, even in some that have signed and
ratified the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
Despite the principle being abstractly accepted, there are serious
obstacles to its application.
It is a common practice in many jurisdictions to deny the principle of
non-self-incrimination by the suspect in the investigative process.
This is to make the suspect the main source of information against him
or herself. The investigators demand that the suspect provides all the
information they request. The right to silence commands little
respect. Based on the source material provided by the suspect, the
investigators conduct any further inquiries. For this purpose, when a
complaint is registered, a suspect is immediately arrested and
interrogated in detention. The suspect is commanded to reveal all the
information in his possession to the investigators. Often, false
promises of quick release or lenient sentences are made to deceive the
suspect to give such information. The investigators fail to caution
the suspect about his or her right not to self-incriminate. In
addition, the threat or use of torture and ill treatment is employed
to obtain such information.
It is also a common practice to attribute statements to suspects with
the intention to falsely incriminate them. For this purpose,
signatures or fingerprints are taken on blank sheets of paper and
later attached to statements that the investigators themselves have
fabricated. These statements are often used at the 'trials'. The
purpose of such 'evidence' is to create the illusion of a trial
when, in fact, what takes place is not really a trial at all.
In some countries, trials are routinely conducted through the process
of self-incrimination. At the very start of the trial, even before the
prosecution leads any evidence, the accused is required to give his
evidence first. Thereafter, the court and the prosecution examine the
veracity of the statement made by the accused. This process is
sometimes called 'seeking truth from facts'. This formula is the
pretext used to allow self-incrimination.
It is a right of the accused to be represented by a lawyer of his
choice. However, in many countries, this right is not observed and, in
some contexts, it is even objected to. This is to maintain a lack of
proper oversight over the investigation and to cover up the flouting
of the basic principles against such manipulations of the criminal
investigation process.
Even in countries where the law recognizes the inadmissibility of
confessions, torture is used to obtain guilty pleas. Methods of
obtaining self-incriminating statements are used to 'gather
evidence', which means finding other witnesses to give the evidence
taken from the accused by the investigators. Thus, even though a
statement of confession by the accused is not formally used during
trial, it is used indirectly. Thus, the various manipulations through
which self-incriminatory statements are obtained from the accused
vitiate trial processes.
The elimination of undue delays:
One of the major obstacles to the development of legal and judicial
processes in many Asian countries is the problem of undue delays in
the adjudication of cases. In several of these countries, such undue
delays have reached scandalous proportions and become a major cause
for a loss of faith in the administration of justice itself.
The Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and
Political Rights under Article 5(2) obligates all states to prevent
undue delay in the administration of justice. The UN Human Rights
Committee, through several of its views on the communications it has
examined, has dealt with the issue of undue delay and has declared it
to be a human rights violation. In one of its views, given in relation
to the communication by Mr. Lalith Rajapakse from Sri Lanka, the UN
Human Rights Committee condemned the undue delay in the enquiry into
the violation of his rights. The problem of undue delay in
investigations, preparing prosecutions, and during adjudication was
examined and the Committee stated that even in the context of a less
developed country, three years' delay in the final adjudication of a
case should be considered undue delay.
However, there are many countries in which such delays are rampant
and, accounting for appeals, criminal cases can take 15 years or more.
In civil cases, such undue delays could extend the adjudication of a
case to 30 or more years. There are many instances in which the cases
have extended beyond the lifetime of litigants and continued even
after their death.
Such undue delays not only demoralise litigants but can also
intimidate governments because certain pieces of legislation they wish
to pursue cannot not be implemented during the period in which the
government bringing it forward is in power. Such a situation
frustrates the process of governance and creates dissatisfaction among
the population. When some governments are faced with this problem they
retaliate by placing restrictions on judicial review and otherwise
attempting to restrict access to courts. The result of this is the
further deterioration of the legal system, which deprives citizens of
the right to seek judicial remedies for perceived wrongs.
Undue delays have also led to an increase of corruption within the
litigation processes. Faced with the problem of undue delay, a
litigant tends to find a shortcut by resorting to various forms of
corruption, which can include attempts to bribe the judges. Further,
there are many instances when litigants or witnesses have been
assassinated or otherwise harmed during the long periods in which
cases are kept pending. The result is that litigants and witnesses are
discouraged from the pursuit of their rights through legal means. All
this adds to public scepticism about the judicial process.
A further result of delay is to distort the litigation process, which
is particularly severe in criminal cases. Judges and prosecutors in
such contexts have been known to agree to unprincipled
'settlements' of cases, which is done to avoid additional burdens
where there is already a large backlog of cases. In some instances,
even serious crimes like murder or rape are 'settled' with minor
punishments, such as the payment of small fines. In short, undue delay
negates access to fair trial and the just adjudication of cases.
Without drastic measures being taken to end undue delays, judicial
processes cannot provide effective remedies.
Denial of the rights of women:
In the Asian context there are manifold forms of denial of rights of
women. Women face acute forms of discrimination in public as well as
private life. Use of brutal forms of punishments to force marriages or
to oppose freely arrived decisions on marriage and other personal
matters is common in Asia.
Women also face other forms of denial of their rights, including but
not limited to their right to education, rights to and in employment
and against women who chose to exercise their freedom as individuals.
Improvements of circumstances in Asia for women to fully participate
in public life is minimal even today.
Physical threats against women, to their person and property, and
sexual violence against women, does not have the possibility of
effective remedy due to the problems iterated above of the justice
framework in Asia. Lack of sensitisation of the law enforcement
agencies and even the judiciary in Asia regarding the unique
challenges faced by women renders complaining about sexual violence
and pursuing justice and remedies a traumatic experience in Asia.
Discrimination against women in the name of menstruation, or murder of
women in the name of family honour, and trafficking in women cannot be
effectively addressed without changes brought into the prevailing
nature of justice dispensation in Asia.
Denial of the rights of children:
Children, particularly from discriminated social groups like the
Dalits, and belonging to the low-income families face acute challenges
in Asia. Prevailing practices of bonded labour facilitates modern
forms of child slavery and the sale of children. In many parts of
rural Asia, there are no schools or there are no adequate facilities
in schools to ensure children from rural areas receive education.
Besides, children from the Dalit communities in Asia are
systematically discriminated by their teachers, often from privileged
castes and communities and therefore denied education.
In some countries there are various forms of imprisonment practiced
against children even if they are of tender age, for offences like
loitering in public roads. Child sexual abuse and trafficking in
children cannot be addressed without adequate and immediate changes
brought into the justice delivery framework. Children who are victims
of child trafficking are often either re-trafficked or sexually abused
even while they are in 'protective custody' of state agencies. One
of the biggest impediments in dealing with child trafficking is the
prevailing extent of criminal nexus that exists within crime
syndicates and law-enforcement agencies.
Concluded....
# # #
The Asian Human Rights Commission (AHRC) works towards the radical
rethinking and fundamental redesigning of justice institutions in
order to protect and promote human rights in Asia. Established in
1984, the Hong Kong based organisation is a Laureate of the Right
Livelihood Award, 2014.
* Asian Human Rights Commission wrote this article
The writer can be contacted at www.humanrights.asia
This article was posted on 19 March , 2018 .
* Comments posted by users in this discussion thread and other parts of this site are opinions of the individuals posting them (whose user ID is displayed alongside) and not the views of e-pao.net. We strongly recommend that users exercise responsibility, sensitivity and caution over language while writing your opinions which will be seen and read by other users. Please read a complete Guideline on using comments on this website.