TODAY -

School voucher for economically disadvantaged children : A policy alternative in Manipur

Yasin Khan *

 Primary School Children receiving Mid day meal at Praja High School, Lamshang :: 12th September 2013
Primary School Children receiving Mid day meal at Praja High School, Lamshang in Sep 2013 :: Pix - Deepak Oinam



One of my Professors, in Azim Premji University, was narrating about improving the livelihood of a poorest of the poor village in India through the microfinance services during his engagement with Basix. They were all deadlock what to do for the village, finally they realized to just give them money and let them decide what they want. That solved the problem without much effort from Basix. The programme which is now conventionally called as direct (conditional) cash transfer, which became popular model in the world of poverty elimination after Brazil's Conditional Cash Transfer named as Bolsa Familia. The whole argument here I want to draw your attention is the significance of freedom of choice to target beneficiary rather than forcing to choose what the state offers from the limited option, thereby allowing the market forces to alleviate the inefficiency in school education, and its impact on children's learning outcome. The argument concludes with my verdict of the debate and how can it be an alternative policy for quality education in Manipur.

The debate on voucher for school education goes back to 1955, the year of publication of Milton Friedman's critique of public education which suggested that vouchers would promote competition in the education market and greater efficiency in primary and secondary schools (Friedman 1955). The basic feature of voucher models involved government education funding on a per student basis to the school of the choice of the parent, which is almost similar to higher education scholarships.

So, argument starts with the deprivation of choice by state. I asked many people for couple of years to all age groups (undocumented) that why they don't choose government school. Recently I asked the same question to a boy in a remote village of Rajasthan, softly he answered "Sarkari school mei padai kaha hoti hei" (where does learning happen in Government school).

A street vendor woman who sell vegetable at Kurji Mor, Patna was narrating me that she enrolled her child to government school just to pass on the grades and in addition private tuition is must as government school does not make the future of children at all, she said. These are just few testimonials witnessed by myself rather than citing a bunch of publications. Moreover, we many times question why children of the teachers of government rural primary school hardly send their children to government school? The answer is almost same as given above by the boy.

It's already established that Low Fee Private (LFP) schools are proliferated even at the remote villages, yet children in government schools are dominated from economically backward or underprivileged families. Family income or wealth of the family is of one the strongest determining factor in parental school choice, meaning that those who are not accessing LFP schools are not doing so because they cannot afford it, as reported by parents (Harma, 2010). Caste and religion are also negatively significant determining factor that to be Muslim or Christian and to be Schedule Caste reduces the chance of accessing to LFP schools (Harma, 2010). Caste or religion per se does not determine wholly that children of these caste or religion goes to government school, rather family of these caste or religion mostly falls under economically underprivileged category.

The above argument supports that voucher for school will help economically underprivileged children get access to LFP schools, as per the choice of the parents. Now the question of the critique of the voucher model of funding school education is whether the private school really effective in terms of student learning outcome compared to government schools or not, is the crux of the debate.

The advocates of voucher school education views the theory of personal choice and market forces as a means of maintaining the social order and maximising the social order, personal choice being more important than social and collective ideals. The main supporting theme of market force is the competition, that competition effect will yield better outcome. Autonomy effect also comes in the picture here, that the assumption that private schools are more efficient and effective than government schools in achieving education outcome as private schools adapt quickly to change i.e. demand of the market (consumers means parents) and more freedom from the centralised bureaucracy. English has become more demanding and more functional which is why private schools pay more attention in learning English than Mathematics. In this context, opponents of school voucher argue that the autonomy will lead to indulge in more globalised culture reducing the preservation of indigenous in terms of linguistic and context. More explanation about impact on learning outcome is being discussed in the succeeding lines. The critiques of school voucher views that the system of voucher education will lead to downplay of social cohesion and equality of opportunity. Meaning, government schools have an inherent advantage in developing social cohesion and unifying social values and social capital, and promote equality of opportunity. My verdict of the debate is being discussed taking help of the findings from Indian context.

Following a debate thread at Mint's editorial titled "Building a schooling system that delivers'' that suggest school voucher will solve India's problem of school education, the counter view of Anurag Behar titled "Politics trumps economics" compelled me to dive into the findings of experimental evidence (Randomized control trail experiment) on the impact of a school choice programme in Andhra Pradesh (India) (the project named as Andhra Pradesh Randomized Evaluation Study (APRESt) that featured a unique two-stage lottery-based allocation of school vouchers.

As cited above the main theme of the debate on voucher schooling is the impact on learning outcome. The finding from the APRESt reaffirm, as other research finding also does, that the there is no difference between the test scores of lottery winner and losers on Mathematics and Telegu (native language) as found by Muralidharan and Sundararaman (2013). The study finds no evidence of adverse effect on government school students who do not apply for the voucher, or on students who starts out to private school. This negates the argument of the opponents of private school that voucher schooling will lessen equality of opportunity and social cohesion. The study takes into account of the instructional timing. Private school pays more time in English, Social Science, Hindi (in the case of Andhra Pradesh) while government school pays more time in Maths and Telegu, even then the results of Maths and Telegu are of no difference between Private schools and Government schools. Meaning, private schools produce same result even when they invest lesser time in Maths and Telegu. Thus the finding claims that private schools are more productive than government schools.

Moreover, the study again claims that, which is consistent with those found by Harma (2010), one demographic group that seems to be significantly benefited from the voucher programme is Muslim students. Muslims are educationally most disadvantaged demographic group in India as per Sachar Committee Report, 2006. This again negates the hypothesis of the opponents of voucher schooling that it will reduce equality of opportunity; rather this reduces educational disparity among demographic groups.

Cost effectiveness is one the critical area of decision making for a policy. The total spending of government in schools is over 3.5 times the mean per child spending in the private schools in the sample of APRESt. Meaning, the average cost per student in the private school is less than one-third of the student of the per student costs in the government schools, and thus the value of the voucher was only around 40% of the per student costs in the government schools. So the finding concludes in terms of cost effectiveness that private schools produce better academic outcomes at lower cost and unambiguously both more productive and cost effective than government schools in Indian context. Therefore, it is to draw the conclusion that from all aspect vouchers for primary schools students would be the best alternative policy for universal quality education for all in India.

Now I would like to bring in the argument in the context of the educational condition of Manipur which is far below the satisfactory level as. The condition of government schools in Manipur are so pathetic (Salam, 2014) that almost all schools have now turned into Cow sheds or home to tall grasses. Government teachers are now doing their side business apart from getting salary of being a government teacher.

Schools are absent of students because of extreme lack of confidence from parents. Former member of steering committee of Vision 2020, N. Mohendra Singh regrets about the condition of education in Manipur stating that "unless the education system is improved at primary level, Manipur will remain backward even 10 to 20 years from now'' as compared to other states. Though the system run by the state is indifference to the situation, parents are sensitive and aware enough for the future of their children. The overall enrolment of students to private school has increased multi fold in rural areas across India. It is fascinating that Manipur is one of the poorest state in India and poorest among North East Council states with 47.1 percent in 2010 and estimated 36.89 percent Below Poverty Line (BPL) for 2011-2012, yet contrary Manipur has 70 per cent of children enrolled in private school which is highest in India, followed by Kerala with 68.6 per cent.

In the situation blend with almost dead state run elementary education and sheer demand of private school from the parents it is an urgent compelling to find an alternative for economically disadvantaged children to meet desirable level of equality of opportunity. I would not suggest for Public Private Partnership (PPP) model which would again demean the core mechanism of market force, the competition effect in bringing quality education. To conclude, the above arguments solely inform us to go for school voucher system especially in Manipur as a policy alternative to the current situation of state run school education which is completely indifferent to the demand of parents and future of the children of Manipur. This is also a policy alternative to cost effectiveness (as discussed above) and quality maintenance. This will partly effect on the economy of the state as the return to education increases, the production theory that returns to education increases as input to education increases. Finally I would like to draw the attention of intellectuals to the debate on the issue for a better Manipur.


* Yasin Khan wrote this article for e-pao.net
The writer is a Gandhi Fellow, Kaivaliya Education Foundation, Rajasthan and presently at Azim Premji University, who can be contacted at ansary(Dot)shent(at)gmailDot)com
This article was posted on September 05, 2014.


* Comments posted by users in this discussion thread and other parts of this site are opinions of the individuals posting them (whose user ID is displayed alongside) and not the views of e-pao.net. We strongly recommend that users exercise responsibility, sensitivity and caution over language while writing your opinions which will be seen and read by other users. Please read a complete Guideline on using comments on this website.


LATEST IN E-PAO.NET
  • Northeast Indian Guide to Thailand
  • Interaction with Steelheart @Imphal: Gallery
  • Khongjom Numit: Last battle of Manipur
  • International Mother Earth Day
  • Selected Candidates to Global Shapers
  • Assam Rifles Ex-servicemen Rally
  • Paying tribute to our martyred forefathers
  • Death penalty for child rapists
  • TRAU Vs Bengaluru FC #1 : Gallery
  • Battle of Khongjhom :: Read about it
  • Ending Plastic Pollution- Earth Day 2018
  • Interaction with Steelheart in Imphal
  • Yet I have hopes and dreams - fancy
  • Seminar @ DM College : Atomic Energy ..
  • Lai Haraoba at Loktak Power Station
  • Teinem Luira Phanit #2: Gallery
  • Governor's Polo (Men) : Gallery
  • World Earth Day 2018
  • Edge of self determination #2
  • Save Meetei & other indigenous people
  • Nirmala Chongtham @ Bamboo Congress
  • Public Relations Day at Loktak
  • Naga Peace Process :: News Timeline
  • Songs of the dark days
  • On cease work strike since March 22
  • Kang Amomgi Tentha : Funga Wari
  • Eyek Tamba :: Learn Manipuri script
  • Piulong khul & Bunning Wildlife Sanctuary
  • The guy in the waiting list
  • Turmeric in beauty care
  • Crisis ahead; this is more dangerous
  • Gearing up for Shirui Lily Fest
  • Do not gag voice of opposition: NPF
  • Garlic Festival @ Ukhrul #1 : Gallery
  • Misplaced Agenda of our CSOs
  • Aribam Devabrata's Mime Play "Kangla Gate"
  • Edge of self determination #1
  • Vardhaman Mahaveer, his life & Jainism
  • Annual General Body meeting of STDCM
  • Land of thousand heroes
  • Present lull before the storm ?
  • Naorem Kalimohon Singh : A Profile
  • Floral tributes to PLA members #2 : Gallery
  • May I tie the knot with a Muslim woman ?
  • Quiz Competition at DM College
  • Cyber warfare: Estonia attack
  • Discussion : South China Sea Disputes
  • The Readers :: Book Discount @MU
  • Democracy: Is the countrymen listening?
  • From Nobap to the top stage
  • Cheiraoba Thabal by LGBTQ #1 : Gallery
  • Cheiraoba @ Kolkata : Gallery
  • Manipuri speaking diaspora in Assam
  • Mangginlian, Lalromawi :: eMing
  • Lomba: best garnish for Yongchak iromba
  • Modern civilisation in Manipur revisited
  • Earning the real good time
  • Meghalaya to consider implementation of ILP
  • NE girls held in Raipur for alleged sex trade
  • Pushing NH-37 to the back burner
  • Cheiraoba Chak Katpa [14 Apr] : Gallery
  • Brajabashimayum Gopal : Akademi Award
  • EEVFAM vs UoI case at Supreme Court
  • Litmus test for Mizoram
  • The present trend of our educational system
  • The rift between parents & children
  • Everything to know about Dermaplaning
  • A heady affair
  • Raped and defiled : India's shame
  • Leima Jagoi @ JNMDA Day: Gallery
  • Right to Religion is a fundamental right
  • Who are Meeteis
  • Meeting of Manipur photography Club
  • Dynamic Manipur's committee for 2018-20
  • BJP's Booth Level Training at Patsoi
  • Sexual violence against women
  • Yaoshang Halankar #2 : Gallery
  • TRAU Vs Mohammedan #2 : Gallery
  • Black sheep in ILPS movement #2
  • SC / HC verdict on Merger Agreement
  • How to practice homoeopathy
  • Sonowal's gesture to Assam journalists
  • Floral tributes to PLA members #1 : Gallery
  • Sikkim University Prospectus : Download
  • Schools are fine, colleges are not
  • The Deceptive Appearance :: Poem
  • Sports for peace and development
  • On organizing Thabal Chongba in Delhi
  • People's bishop gets Bharat Gaurav Award
  • Inner Line Permit (ILP) Demand :: Timeline
  • Banning the Bandh
  • A strong Opposition is healthy
  • Yangkhulen (57 Km from Maram) : Gallery
  • Statehood Women's Polo #2 : Gallery
  • An autobiography of MK Priyobarta
  • Lamkoi Shirui Camp 2.0 at Ukhrul
  • RIST Talk -35 @MU : Thermal plasma
  • Police Harassment of Human Rights Activist
  • Favouritism of PDA Govt is shameful
  • Where the mind is without fear
  • End authoritarian rule call of Cong
  • 'HUN' Thadou Cultural Festival #1 : Gallery
  • Kabui Dance @JNMDA : Gallery
  • Gangmei Aluna Kabuini : Nrityabhusan
  • Good & bad of Nung hawai consumption
  • Sadar Hills District Demand :: Timeline
  • Meitei - Scheduled Tribe ?
  • Career options after graduation
  • Food safety concerns
  • Response to Rijiju: Stand off on sovereignty
  • Two Princes :: Funga Wari
  • Yaoshang Sport @Bamon Leikai: Gallery
  • Armed Force (Special Power) Act 1958 #3
  • Cry of a Dying River - 25 :: Poem
  • Centre for Vietnam Studies, New Delhi
  • Leingakki Firem Handoktriphaoba..
  • Seeking report on Thoungamba's death
  • 3rd Northeast Fiesta 2018 : Event Report
  • Traffic: Still yet to find a lasting solution
  • From Go to Hills to Go to Village
  • Md Awaysh Khan: Mr. India : Gallery
  • Horizon : An Exhaustive Review
  • Is Delhi serious to resolve Naga issue?
  • JRF position wanted at Manipur University
  • Dams & hydropower push in Himalayas
  • Can satan encourage hard work ?
  • DGP distributed DG Commendation Discs
  • Of attack and threat to common men
  • Ruling out sovereignty, integration
  • Folk Dance @Retreat ceremony #4: Gallery
  • The entry of Gorkha in Manipur
  • Khelen Thokchom, some fond memories
  • The Singing Stones :: Poem
  • 109 Bn, CRPF celebrated 28th Raising day
  • Swarajya Magazine tender apology
  • Cheiraoba Chak Katpa #2 : Gallery
  • Women Final: Governor Polo #2 : Gallery
  • Air pollution is an invisible killer
  • Manipur as part of India during Krishna
  • Global Shapers is calling for Application
  • Heart OPD & Free Echo Screening Camp
  • Winter School 2018 at NEHU concluded
  • On forged cheque issue: Pandora Box
  • Accounting for two of 4 won so far
  • Mahesh Thounaojam #2 : eRang Photos
  • TRAU Vs Mohammedan #1 : Gallery
  • Science of stink: Dealing with odour
  • Time lost cost in cyber crime: IGI Airport
  • BJP Patsoi : 38th Foundation Day
  • The making of sports powerhouse
  • Rape in the land of Meira Paibis
  • Kamo Hau Culturals @Kamjong: Gallery
  • Armed Force (Special Power) Act 1958 #2
  • Cry of a Dying River - 24 :: Poem
  • Tribute to Khelen Thokchom
  • Last of his ilk
  • Open letter to Jaideep Majumdar- Swarajya
  • Effort to make our leader understand
  • RIMS road heist : Daylight robbery
  • Major Bob Ralengnao Khathing
  • Pung Chollom @JNMDA : Gallery
  • Mnipur Ima :: Seireng
  • Kou-kha : Wetland tuber cash crop
  • Jobs at Don Bosco Tech Society
  • NPF replies to news portal report
  • The Killing Fields (2013-17) :: Timeline
  • Prohibition against peoples' will
  • Congress in its avatar as an Oppn
  • Mukna Khong Kangjei #2: Gallery
  • Partnerships should be based on solidarity
  • Volunteers for Green Khamasom (VGK)
  • Social media: Boon or medium to hurt..
  • A requiem for Ta Khelen
  • Northeast Fiesta 2018 at Jalandhar, Punjab
  • Jobs @ PR Enterprises, Khurai
  • Vegetables grown @Thanga #2: Gallery
  • Khaidem Tarubi :: Akademi Awards
  • Angaobi :: Poem
  • A cocktail of mythology, science & religion
  • Beauty benefits of tomatoes
  • Condolence message for Khelen Thokchom
  • Communal politics in social media
  • RIP Tamo Khelen .. always in our heart
  • Blank Editorial
  • Tributes to Khelen Thokchom : Gallery
  • Men Final: Governor Polo #1 : Gallery
  • Armed Force (Special Power) Act 1958 #1
  • Scientific Perspective: Biren's speech
  • Ukhrul Sanitary Movement & social evil
  • JFA express grief at Thokchom's demise
  • Yaoshang Nakatheng Chatpa #3 : Gallery
  • April Calendar for Year 2018 :: Tools
  • Thangjiyen: Culinary item during Cheiraoba
  • Nongthombam Biren hasn't a clue
  • Easter: A moment of reorganization
  • A Spark of My Poem :: Poem
  • Asian solidarity on the Rohingya crisis
  • The blunder in Indian Political system
  • Respecting the essence of Good Friday
  • Folk Dance @Retreat ceremony #3: Gallery
  • Sajibu Cheiraoba Chingkaba #3: Gallery
  • Dr. Athouba honored Hindi Sevi Pracharak
  • Women Final: Governor Polo #1 : Gallery
  • Ringui Luira Phanit @Ukhrul : Gallery
  • Landscape from Koubru #1 : Gallery
  • Yaoshang Sport - Marathon #2: Gallery
  • PM at Science Congress @MU #2: Gallery
  • Lui-Ngai-Ni @Longmai (TML) #5 : Gallery
  • Sanakhya Ebotombi Haorokcham: Biography
  • PM Narendra Modi @Imphal #2 : Gallery
  • Sajibu Cheiraoba Chingkaba #2: Gallery
  • Enakta Leiringei (Film) #2 :: eRang
  • Yaoshang Cooking Contest #2 : Gallery
  • Front Page Photo 2018 #1: Gallery
  • Temples of Manipur : Gallery
  • Recipients of Akademi Awards for 2014
  • Old Manipuri Movie #1 :: eRang Classic
  • SPONSORED ADS